This submission addresses the draft General Comment No. 38 to the Human Rights Committee (2026) from the standpoint of the material vulnerabilities of the right to freedom of association under Article 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The intervention proceeds from documented patterns of regulatory capture and private actor complicity that systematically defeat formal protections, identifying structural gaps at the critical thresholds where scope and restriction become operationally incoherent: the instrumentalisation of “licit” criteria; administrative suspension through procedural attrition; the conflation of association and individual culpability under counter-terrorism regimes; the transnational replication of designations through private financial exclusion; and the irreversible character of measures nominally adopted under derogation.
The argument establishes that the non-derogability of Article 15 extends fundamentally to the criminalisation of association, and that Article 22(2) must accommodate both temporal and substantive dimensions of personal culpability—a proposition grounded in the European Court’s treatment of retroactive liability and organizational attribution. Positive obligations under Article 22 extend equally to the conduct of private actors, including banks and financial intermediaries, rendering States responsible for de-banking practices that operate independent of official designation. Strategic lawsuits, states of emergency, and the obstruction of associational standing to represent collective interests emerge as sites of systematic failure in the right’s formal architecture. The submission contextualizes these gaps against emerging European instruments (CM/Rec(2024)2, Directive (EU) 2024/1069) and ILO jurisprudence, proposing that the second reading operationalize protection through explicit procedural architecture at the level of substantive institutional design.
Click here to read the full report.