Help to our cause.
Conseil de l'EuropeCouncil of EuropeSoumissionsSubmissions

ASSEDEL Submits Observations to the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers Under Rule 9.2

Following the retrial of Mr. Yalçınkaya, the judgment of the Kayseri Second Assize Court reveals that the Turkish judiciary is hesitant to enforce the Court´s judgment. 

Yüksel Yalçınkaya was working as a teacher before the 15 July 2016 coup attempt. On account of his suspected affiliation with the Gülen Movement, he was first dismissed from service by Legislative Decree no. 672, and later, on the 6th of October 2016, he was arrested.  

The 2023 Grand Chamber judgment found violations of Article 6(1), Article 7, and Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The judgment indicated that claims by the Turkish state that alleged crimes committed by Mr. Yalçınkaya lacked legality and foreseeability, thus constituting a violation of Article 7 (nullum crimennulla poena sine lege). The allegations against the applicant were based on his alleged online activity on the ByLock application, linking him directly to membership in an armed terrorist organization and involvement in the hierarchical structure of FETÖ/PDY, claims which the applicant consistently denied, stating that he never downloaded the app.

In addition, following the judgment, several other people were detained with similar claims over the alleged use of the ByLock application. Even though the Court’s judgment should have set a precedent for similar cases pending before domestic courts, the Turkish judiciary has been systemically refusing to implement the judgment of the Court for the criminal proceedings in similar cases to Mr. Yalçınkaya.

The action plan submitted by Türkiye aimed to portray the violations as non-systemic. The Turkish judiciary must have the remedies to effectively address individual measures in such cases.

To read the full report, please click here.

Related posts
ActualitésCouncil of EuropeSubmissions

Artificial Intelligence and the Law: The Need to Strengthen the Existing Regulatory Framework for Live Facial Recognition by Law Enforcement in the United Kingdom

As live facial recognition (LFR) becomes more common in public spaces across the United Kingdom, critical questions are being raised about its…
Soumissions

Human rights at risk: an analysis of the Italian Security Bill (Decreto Sicurezza) and its impact on fundamental freedoms

The enactment of the Italian Security Bill (Decreto Sicurezza), formalized through Decree-Law No. 48 of 11 April 2025 and later converted into…
European ParliementSubmissions

An evaluation of the EU Anti-Racism Action Plan 2020-2025

Notwithstanding decades of anti-discrimination laws, racial and ethnic minorities across Europe continue to face persistent barriers to equality. In response, the EU…
Subscribe to our newsletter!

Subscribe to get the latest information about our struggle to promote human rights.