Aidez notre cause.
OpinionOpinion

SUPPORTING UKRANIAN REFUGEES (From Temporary Protection to Local Integration)

Four years into the war, millions of Ukrainians remain displaced across Europe. By April 2026 roughly 4.4 million non-EU nationals (mostly Ukrainians) were under the EU’s Temporary Protection scheme, and some 6.8 million Ukrainians were displaced abroad. Initially managed as an emergency, the focus has shifted to longer-term integration. Local and regional authorities now confront sustained demands on housing, education, health, labour-market and social services, while gearing up for the eventual transition to residence status or return. Evidence from official sources highlights continued high aspirations to return home (war permitting), but persistent obstacles – notably damaged housing, employment gaps and security concerns – slow returns.  Local initiatives (“integration hubs”, multilingual services, volunteer networks) and multi-level cooperation have helped. Yet challenges remain: uneven reception capacity, fiscal strain on municipalities, and risks of social exclusion, especially for vulnerable groups. To address this, we recommend maintaining coordinated TP regimes, easing the TP-to-residency transition, boosting funding for LRAs (including earmarked EU/National funds), and scaling up proven local practices (e.g. community integration centres). Protecting rights and supporting cohesion – through anti-discrimination measures, trauma-informed care and public information – is essential.  This brief draws on recent EU, UNHCR, OECD, FRA, and Council of Europe analyses, and highlights illustrative cases (with sources) to guide policy.

The war-induced displacement remains unprecedented: Europe hosts the largest refugee influx since WW2 (OECD, 2026). As of early 2026, 4.4 million Ukrainian refugees were under TP in the EU (plus sizeable flows in non-EU countries). Germany (≈1.28 M), Poland (≈0.97 M), and Czechia (≈0.38 M) alone host the majority. TP status has been extended (currently to 4 Mar 2027, and proposals exist to extend to 2028). About 4.5 million were under TP by end-2025. Recognition of Ukrainian asylum claims is high in some countries (e.g. ~90% in Estonia/France) but low in others (3% in Germany in 2025), reflecting shifting policies. Surveys indicate mixed intentions: roughly one-third want to return to Ukraine, one-third prefer to stay, and one-quarter are undecided. The majority planned to return eventually, but the ongoing war prevents short-term returns.

Reception capacity and public services vary widely.  Many refugees rely on private accommodation (60% in FRA survey), often at cost and overcrowded (shared kitchens/bathrooms, lack of study space for children).  Municipalities face housing shortages: rents and home prices have surged in key cities (e.g. Vilnius saw +24% price rise in early 2022). In some places (e.g. Prague in May 2022), makeshift camps were opened due to acute demand. Education uptake lags: <50% of school-age children continued education in the host country, largely due to language barriers. Labour-market absorption is uneven: about two-thirds of pre-war workers found jobs, but overall two-thirds of working-age refugees remained unemployed, hindered by language, childcare, and recognition issues. Psychosocial distress is high – ~50% of adults often feel depressed and nearly all experienced war-related trauma – straining health and social support systems.  

Cliquez ici to read the full report.

Related posts
ActualitésActualitésOpinionOpinion

Reading the Dissents: A Doctrinal Critique of Separate Opinions in Yasak v. Türkiye

This ASSEDEL commentary offers a doctrinal critique of three separate opinions delivered in the Grand Chamber judgment Yasak v. Türkiye (no. 17389/20,…
ActualitésOpinionOpinion

Lettre ouverte à la FIFA

ASSEDEL (Association for Sustainable Development, Equality and Liberty) publishes this open letter to express its serious concern regarding credible reports of alleged…
ActualitésActualitésOpinionOpinion

Report on the Access to Healthcare and "Medical Deserts" in France

The term ‘medical desert’ has become established in public debate as a way of describing the difficulties in accessing healthcare in certain…
Abonnez-vous à notre newsletter!

Abonnez-vous pour recevoir les dernières informations sur notre lutte pour promouvoir les droits de l'homme.