Help to our cause.
Conseil de l'EuropeCouncil of EuropeSoumissionsSubmissions

Initial Observations on the Implementation of Telek and Others v. Turkey

(Application no. 66763/17, 66767/17, 15891/18)

Introduction

In line with Rule 9.2 of the Committee of Ministers, ASSEDEL provides this communication regarding the implementation of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) judgement in Telek and Others v. Turkey. This report offers updates and critical insights into both individual and general measures reported by the Turkish Government concerning the execution of this judgment.

Case Description

The case addresses violations of the right to private life due to the unlawful revocation of passports under Decree-Laws enacted during a state of emergency. The applicants, former academics dismissed from public service, experienced significant travel restrictions due to their alleged links to activities deemed detrimental to national security. The Court found these measures lacked clear boundaries, enabling potential abuse of discretion by Turkish authorities.

Individual Measures

Despite lifting passport restrictions for each applicant, ASSEDEL points out that the broader systemic issue remains unresolved. While the applicants received new passports, the underlying policies enabling arbitrary restrictions are still in place.

General Measures

ASSEDEL highlights continued restrictions affecting thousands in Turkey. Reports from Freedom House and the US Department of State reveal widespread limitations on freedom of movement, particularly targeting those accused of connections to the 2016 coup attempt. Turkish legislation, such as Article 22 of the Passport Law No. 5682, grants extensive discretionary power to the Ministry of Interior, often leading to arbitrary restrictions on citizensʼ right to travel.

Conclusion and Recommendations

Despite the Courtʼs judgment, the Turkish Government has shown limited commitment to enacting necessary legislative changes. ASSEDEL calls on the Committee of Ministers to monitor this case closely, advocating for enhanced procedural reviews to prevent similar violations.

To read the full submission, please click here.

Related posts
Soumissions

Shaping the Parliamentary Assembly’s relations with the United Nations Human Rights Council

In today’s rapidly changing world, the protection of human rights depends on strong cooperation between international institutions. Two of the most important…
Soumissions

Comments and recommendations for the Hungarian draft law on the "Transparency of public life"

This report by ASSEDEL (L’Association européenne pour la défense des droits et des libertés) critically scrutinizes the Hungarian draft law entitled on…
SubmissionsUncategorized

Expansive Interpretation of Protocol 1: A Comparative Analysis of Indigenous LandRights in Regional Human Rights Courts

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights(IACtHR) have taken markedly different approaches to Indigenous land…
Subscribe to our newsletter!

Subscribe to get the latest information about our struggle to promote human rights.