{"id":8531,"date":"2026-06-04T08:55:42","date_gmt":"2026-06-04T08:55:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/?p=8531"},"modified":"2026-06-04T09:56:52","modified_gmt":"2026-06-04T09:56:52","slug":"the-judicial-system-at-risk-a-comparative-analysis-of-the-instrumentalization-of-judicial-power-in-turkey-and-the-united-states","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/the-judicial-system-at-risk-a-comparative-analysis-of-the-instrumentalization-of-judicial-power-in-turkey-and-the-united-states\/","title":{"rendered":"Le syst\u00e8me judiciaire en p\u00e9ril : une analyse comparative de l'instrumentalisation du pouvoir judiciaire en Turquie et aux \u00c9tats-Unis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dans son nouveau rapport <em>Le syst\u00e8me judiciaire en p\u00e9ril : une analyse comparative de l'instrumentalisation du pouvoir judiciaire en Turquie et aux \u00c9tats-Unis<\/em>, l'ASSEDEL examine comment le recul de la d\u00e9mocratie peut s'op\u00e9rer par le biais de l'affaiblissement de l'ind\u00e9pendance judiciaire. Le rapport compare deux contextes politiques distincts \u2014 les \u00c9tats-Unis sous Donald Trump et la Turquie sous Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan \u2014 afin de montrer comment les institutions juridiques peuvent \u00eatre remodel\u00e9es et utilis\u00e9es pour \u00e9tendre le pouvoir ex\u00e9cutif.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>L'analyse met en \u00e9vidence deux grandes tendances. Premi\u00e8rement, elle examine la transformation institutionnelle du pouvoir judiciaire. Aux \u00c9tats-Unis, le rapport se concentre sur l'impact \u00e0 long terme des nominations judiciaires strat\u00e9giques et sur la politisation des tribunaux f\u00e9d\u00e9raux. En Turquie, il examine un processus plus direct de contr\u00f4le judiciaire, notamment la destitution de juges et de procureurs, les poursuites engag\u00e9es contre des professionnels du droit et l'influence accrue de l'ex\u00e9cutif sur le recrutement des magistrats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Deuxi\u00e8mement, le rapport aborde la question de l'instrumentalisation politique du syst\u00e8me judiciaire. Il soutient que, dans les deux pays, les institutions juridiques ont \u00e9t\u00e9 utilis\u00e9es non seulement pour faire respecter la loi, mais aussi pour renforcer la loyaut\u00e9 politique, affaiblir l'opposition et r\u00e9duire la responsabilit\u00e9 institutionnelle. Bien que les m\u00e9thodes diff\u00e8rent en termes d'ampleur et d'intensit\u00e9, ces deux cas illustrent les risques qui apparaissent lorsque les tribunaux et les parquets cessent de jouer leur r\u00f4le de contre-pouvoir ind\u00e9pendant face au pouvoir ex\u00e9cutif.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En mettant en parall\u00e8le les exp\u00e9riences turque et am\u00e9ricaine, le rapport met en avant un avertissement plus g\u00e9n\u00e9ral : l'\u00e9rosion de la d\u00e9mocratie ne se produit pas toujours par une rupture soudaine. Elle peut \u00e9galement s'installer progressivement, par le biais de nominations partisanes, de poursuites s\u00e9lectives, de pressions exerc\u00e9es sur les professionnels du droit et de la normalisation de l'ing\u00e9rence de l'ex\u00e9cutif dans le pouvoir judiciaire. Pour l'ASSEDEL, la protection de l'ind\u00e9pendance judiciaire reste essentielle pour pr\u00e9server la d\u00e9mocratie, l'\u00c9tat de droit et les droits fondamentaux.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Vous trouverez <a href=\"https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/The-Judicial-System-at-Risk-A-Comparative-Analysis-of-the-Instrumentalization-of-Judicial-Power-in-Turkey-and-the-United-States.pdf\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/The-Judicial-System-at-Risk-A-Comparative-Analysis-of-the-Instrumentalization-of-Judicial-Power-in-Turkey-and-the-United-States.pdf\">ici <\/a>le rapport complet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In its new report, The Judicial System at Risk: A Comparative Analysis of the Instrumentalization of Judicial Power in Turkey and the&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":864,"featured_media":8538,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"give_campaign_id":0,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[28,96],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-8531","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-opinion-eng","8":"category-opinionfr"},"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2.png",1280,720,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2-300x169.png",300,169,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2-768x432.png",768,432,true],"large":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2-1024x576.png",1024,576,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2.png",1280,720,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2.png",1280,720,false],"trp-custom-language-flag":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2-18x10.png",18,10,true],"inhype-blog-thumb":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2-1140x694.png",1140,694,true],"inhype-blog-thumb-grid":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2-555x360.png",555,360,true],"inhype-blog-thumb-widget":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2-220x180.png",220,180,true],"inhype-blog-thumb-masonry":["https:\/\/assedel.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Horizontal-Cover-Pages-YouTube-Website-2-360x203.png",360,203,true]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Pablo De la serna","author_link":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/author\/pablo\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"In its new report, The Judicial System at Risk: A Comparative Analysis of the Instrumentalization of Judicial Power in Turkey and the...","amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/864"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8531"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8531\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8534,"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8531\/revisions\/8534"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8538"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/assedel.org\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}